addiction
state characterized by compulsive engagement in rewarding stimuli despite adverse consequences
--Agreed Upon Solutions

Executive Summary

A majority of respondents believe that providing controlled places for addicts to safely use substances is more effective for harm reduction and reducing addiction than arresting addicts.

  • Agreement range reported: 67%–97%.
Key Takeaway

Harm‑reduction facilities are viewed as superior to criminal‑justice approaches for addressing addiction.

What People Believe

Harm reduction vs arrest effectiveness

Providing controlled places for addicts to safely use substances is more effective for harm reduction and reducing addiction than arresting addicts.

The comment suggests that harm‑reduction facilities are viewed as superior to criminal‑justice approaches for addressing addiction.

  • Agreement range reported: 67%–97%.

Suggested Policies and Actions

Vote Details

Comment
providing controlled places for addicts to safely use substances does much more in terms of harm reduction and reducing addiction than arresting addicts can
--anonymous