A majority of respondents believe that providing controlled places for addicts to safely use substances is more effective for harm reduction and reducing addiction than arresting addicts.
Harm‑reduction facilities are viewed as superior to criminal‑justice approaches for addressing addiction.
Providing controlled places for addicts to safely use substances is more effective for harm reduction and reducing addiction than arresting addicts.
The comment suggests that harm‑reduction facilities are viewed as superior to criminal‑justice approaches for addressing addiction.